Do Dog Breeds Really Matter in Dog Bite Cases?

Some dog breeds are unfairly labeled as aggressive, with pit bulls and rottweilers often facing the most scrutiny. However, when it comes to dog bite cases in California, legal accountability focuses on the owner—not the breed.

Legal Responsibility in Dog Bite Cases

California’s strict liability laws hold dog owners accountable for bites, regardless of the breed. The dog’s size, appearance, or reputation does not impact the legal outcome. Santosh Narayan has successfully represented victims in cases where breed stereotypes were used as a defense, ensuring justice was served.

Why Behavior Matters More Than Breed

A dog’s behavior is influenced by its environment, training, and treatment. Neglect and lack of restraint often play a larger role in attacks than genetics. Santosh’s experience extends to cases involving smaller breeds, proving that any dog can cause harm under specific conditions.

Breaking Down Breed Myths in Court

Misconceptions about certain breeds can complicate dog bite cases. Opposing counsel or insurance companies may try to exploit stereotypes to reduce compensation. Santosh’s in-depth knowledge of dog bite laws ensures that the focus remains on the facts—not myths.

Building a Strong Case Against Dog Owners

Winning dog bite cases requires more than challenging stereotypes. Thorough evidence collection, detailed case preparation, and a strong understanding of local laws are critical. Santosh Narayan’s strategic approach has helped victims feel confident and supported in their pursuit of justice.

Dog bites can happen with any breed, making owner accountability the key issue. Santosh Narayan’s dedication to his clients ensures that breed myths do not overshadow the facts, providing victims with the advocacy they deserve.